On Type Rename for #88424

[octref]

This fixes #88424.

• Adding editor option editor.renameOnType
• Adding proposed API languages.registerOnTypeRenameProvider
• Adding onTypeRenameProvider for HTML

Proposed API:

namespace languages {
	/**
	 * Register a rename provider that works on type.
	 *
	 * Multiple providers can be registered for a language. In that case providers are sorted
	 * by their [score](#languages.match) and the best-matching provider is used. Failure
	 * of the selected provider will cause a failure of the whole operation.
	 *
	 * @param selector A selector that defines the documents this provider is applicable to.
	 * @param provider An on type rename provider.
	 * @param stopPattern Stop on type renaming when input text matches the regular expression. Defaults to `^\s`.
	 * @return A [disposable](#Disposable) that unregisters this provider when being disposed.
	 */
	export function registerOnTypeRenameProvider(selector: DocumentSelector, provider: OnTypeRenameProvider, stopPattern?: RegExp): Disposable;
}

I think most of the cases work fine. There are 2 failing tests but I'm not sure why they happen, since the behavior in the editor is correct but the test still fails.

The two cases that's failing in the editor are:

• Option + Delete and then undo for <div|></div>
• Paste (with content div) and then undo for <div|></div>

The cause seems to be that setting EditorOperationType doesn't work for paste/delete-word.

But other than that, this seems to work fine. I'm planning to put it in insiders and turn it on for people who have enabled html.mirrorCursorOnType.

[alexdima]

Looks good! I just left a few comments.

[alexdima]

I like to keep these sorted alphabetically, please move it down a bit.

[alexdima]

also here, please move it down a bit.

[alexdima]

I think Ctrl+F2/Cmd+F2 are already taken, so perhaps no keybindings is necessary here.

[alexdima]

@octref There is still the problem of the Ctrl+F2 conflict, and some tests that need to be skipped.

👍 Otherwise, please merge. I suggest other work in HTML to adopt this feature should IMHO be done in another PR.

[IllusionMH]

With

Take HTML implementation out 600a776

does it really closes #88424 or it should be closed with HTML implementation merged?

[octref]

@IllusionMH I pushed 01e01b1