-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct the seco weight names #1593
Conversation
Having trouble reproducing the original issue so it's hard for me to verify that it's now fixed. |
Gives:
@nilsleh, is this correct? The new weights don't have any entries for layer 3 or layer 4. |
I used the script you posted in the issue to update the weights and didn't check further. I will look into again. |
Oh oops... sorry for leading you in the wrong direction here! Good to not trust my code unless it has been reviewed by Adam. |
Sorry, turns out the mistake was on my end of course, just always better to first blame others... |
Still curious how to reproduce the original issue so I can confirm that things have actually been fixed. If our (slow) tests don't catch this bug, then I'm worried about our tests. |
The following works for getting the SeCo pretrained weights in a timm resnet format:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Figured out how to test, just need to run the slow tests pytest -m slow tests/models
and either make it strict or assert that there are no missing/unexpected keys.
Closes #1234