-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reportingdescriptor name to string change #1309
Conversation
"text": "Rules were meant to be broken." | ||
}, | ||
"fullDescription": { | ||
"text": "This is a test for validating modification of tool.driver.ruleDescriptors" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tool.driver.ruleDescriptors [](start = 71, length = 27)
i might need a bit of help in coming up with more TCs to ensure all paths are tested. Will sync up offline. I am ok adding those as part of separate PR is required. #WontFix
...Data/SarifVersionOneToCurrentVisitor/ExpectedOutputs/OneRunWithAllReportingDescriptors.sarif
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
remove all default ranks of -1.0. they should always be elided from persisted content. this content isn't strictly illegal per schema, of course. #Resolved Refers to: src/Sarif.UnitTests/TestData/SarifVersionOneToCurrentVisitor/ExpectedOutputs/OneRunWithRules.sarif:32 in 04763a1. [](commit_id = 04763a1, deletion_comment = False) |
...ests/TestData/SarifVersionOneToCurrentVisitor/Inputs/OneRunWithAllReportingDescriptors.sarif
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🕐
@michaelcfanning we resolved the discussed comments. If there are no additional comments, i love for this one to get merged before i start the final changes for localization removal. Can you please take a look :-) |
This is a WIP. I have to add more TCs to ensure various paths to reach ReportingDescriptor.Name are tested, raising PR to get early feedback on approach.
@michaelcfanning Please review ApplyChangesFromTC32 specifically as its looking a bit complex :)