EP context for custom op #16454
Merged
EP context for custom op #16454
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
RandySheriffH
commented
Aug 2, 2023
Add ROCM support --------- Co-authored-by: RandySheriff <[email protected]>
souptc
reviewed
Aug 8, 2023
onnxruntime/test/testdata/custom_op_library/custom_op_library.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PREfast found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
move static Co-authored-by: Randy Shuai <[email protected]>
…runtime into rashuai/EpContext
souptc
reviewed
Aug 16, 2023
souptc
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2023
kleiti
pushed a commit
to kleiti/onnxruntime
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
Implement infrastructures to allow EP resources surfaced to custom ops. --------- Co-authored-by: Randy Shuai <[email protected]>
snnn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2024
### Description The header files were added in PR #16454. Then, recently I made a PR #21464 that changed how we packed Linux tarballs. The new tarball misses the custom op header files. Therefore I need to make this change. ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
prathikr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2024
### Description The header files were added in PR #16454. Then, recently I made a PR #21464 that changed how we packed Linux tarballs. The new tarball misses the custom op header files. Therefore I need to make this change. ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
prathikr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2024
### Description The header files were added in PR #16454. Then, recently I made a PR #21464 that changed how we packed Linux tarballs. The new tarball misses the custom op header files. Therefore I need to make this change. ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implement infrastructures to allow EP resources surfaced to custom ops.