-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add JSON path supplier parameter to visitor functions #62
Merged
aeschli
merged 1 commit into
microsoft:main
from
Marcono1234:marcono1234/visitor-json-path
Dec 30, 2021
Merged
Add JSON path supplier parameter to visitor functions #62
aeschli
merged 1 commit into
microsoft:main
from
Marcono1234:marcono1234/visitor-json-path
Dec 30, 2021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Marcono1234
commented
Nov 7, 2021
assert.deepEqual(errors, expectedErrors); | ||
assert.deepEqual(actuals, expected, JSON.stringify(actuals)); | ||
assert.deepStrictEqual(errors, expectedErrors); | ||
assert.deepStrictEqual(actuals, expected, JSON.stringify(actuals)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
function assertNodeAtLocation(input: Node | undefined, segments: Segment[], expected: any) { | ||
let actual = input && findNodeAtLocation(input, segments); | ||
assert.deepEqual(actual ? getNodeValue(actual) : void 0, expected); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have not replaced this with assert.deepStrictEqual
because then the test fails.
Really cool, thanks @Marcono1234 ! |
This was referenced Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #50
The implementation follows the behavior described in #50:
onObjectBegin
,onObjectProperty
,onArrayBegin
andonLiteralValue
a JSON path supplier parameter was addedonObjectProperty
the path refers to the enclosing JSON object; including the current property name in the path already would be a bit inconsistent because it would not really be the path of the current property nameAdditionally I have replaced
assert.equal
calls withassert.strictEqual
andassert.deepEqual
withassert.deepStrictEqual
because these functions are marked as deprecated.I am not that familiar with TypeScript, so any feedback is appreciated!