Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azureSettings file in WebApps shouldn't be created by default #106

Closed
kamaljit opened this issue Feb 17, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

azureSettings file in WebApps shouldn't be created by default #106

kamaljit opened this issue Feb 17, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@kamaljit
Copy link
Member

when i create a new WebApp in IntelliJ (after installing the Azure plugin), i notice that azureSettings.xml file is created by default under the .idea folder. i haven't selected anything to do with Azure so far, so why does this get created?

i notice that it does get updated with my subscription id, tenant id, etc after i select to publish to Azure, which is fine. But why are we creating this if i haven't selected to use Azure yet.

@martinsawicki
Copy link
Contributor

lower pri, as no harm appears to be done - but this is old legacy that should be eventually cleaned up

@andxu
Copy link
Contributor

andxu commented Jul 7, 2020

very trivial

@andxu
Copy link
Contributor

andxu commented Dec 1, 2021

The feature will be "deprecate old settings file: azureSettings.xml"

@andxu andxu closed this as completed Dec 1, 2021
@andxu andxu reopened this Dec 1, 2021
@andxu andxu assigned andxu and unassigned Flanker32 Dec 1, 2021
@andxu andxu added this to the backlog milestone Dec 1, 2021
@wangmingliang-ms wangmingliang-ms modified the milestones: backlog, 202209 Sep 2, 2022
ivywei0125 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2022
Flanker32 pushed a commit to Flanker32/azure-tools-for-java that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2023
…nect

Add "Connect to server/database" actions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants