Skip to content

keep the model and the workflow in-sync. #88

Answered by abbasc52
chandramohank asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Currently it is not possible with RulesEngine.

This problem is actually prevalent in any object model mapping.
The simplest workaround would be to maintain 2 classes:-

  1. class1 which maps directly to the workflow
  2. class2 which has frequent property name changes and then mapping it to class1 before passing to RulesEngine(RE)

This process could have been integrated in RE if RE offered globalParams at workflow level like we offer localParams at rule level. But currently that feature is under review and has not been implemented yet.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by chandramohank
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants