AADUser advanced query filter support

[ifinch]

Pull Request (PR) description

advanced query filter support

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

-Fixes #2430

[bartvermeersch]

Hello @ifinch

I noticed some tenant specific info in your PR:

Microsoft365DSC/Modules/Microsoft365DSC/DSCResources/MSFT_AADUser/MSFT_AADUser.psm1

Lines 981 to 982 in 310ecc2

	'extension_4750531c75d84e8698ecd21bbd5da9f5_fruitPreference',
	'extension_4750531c75d84e8698ecd21bbd5da9f5_test',

Also, have you considered the addition of a new switch parameters AdvancedQuery to set the CountVariable and ConsistencyLevel instead of adding the extra logic? In all available Graph SDK's the user has the responsibility to specify if the query is "advanced" (or not).

Keeping up with future changes in the graph for these query types and properties seems a lot of extra work. Similar logic will have to be implemented on other DSC resource (AADGroups, ...) as well.

[ifinch]

Hey @bartvermeersch ,

Those ones are precented in the advanced query doc
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/aad-advanced-queries?tabs=http#user-properties

extension_4750531c75d84e8698ecd21bbd5da9f5_fruitPreference
extension_4750531c75d84e8698ecd21bbd5da9f5_fruitPreference/any(p:p)
extension_4750531c75d84e8698ecd21bbd5da9f5_test

However, there is difference how MgUser vs MsBetaUsers and as MgUser used, some of the extensions should be cleaned up including those you pointed out.

I have not considered AdvancedQuery switch this far.

[ifinch]

Hi @NikCharlebois , anything extra needed to follow up on this removing from On-Hold state?

[NikCharlebois]

My only concern here is that we will need to manage a hardcoded list of possible filters.

[ifinch]

My only concern here is that we will need to manage a hardcoded list of possible filters.

completely agreed, but not that many options we have now to make differently AFAIK

[ifinch]

Hi @NikCharlebois any ETA on this to be merged?

[ifinch]

removed printing "Filter is null" on export with a Write-Host