-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correct power output detail for the every channel used case #749
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
79d6ca4
to
902ec5d
Compare
902ec5d
to
8d70b74
Compare
docs/manual/MAIN_CONTROLLER_SPECS.md
Outdated
|Speaker Power | 55 WPC @ 4 Ω | | ||
| | 32 WPC @ 8 Ω | | ||
| | 23 WPC all-channel driven power | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure how you want to format this in here, but these measurements are for <0.1% THD+N and taken at 1kHz. Both of those are important because they strongly influence the result. For example the much higher 10%THD (note the lack of +N which also makes this weaker) of the amp chip spec results in a much higher output wattage, but when tested I had to clip the signal to get 10% THD.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm putting this in front of you largely cuz I have no idea how to properly represent that data; this is not my area of expertise.
Could you provide a recommendation on how you would represent it?
@Lohrer where is this at? Should we just try to merge this as-is? |
What does this change intend to accomplish?
This PR attempts to add clarity around our all-channel peak output power (am I even saying that right?)
I'd like feedback on how this is represented; I will go through the process of stamping out a new rendered manual and hosting it upstream once the verbiage here is correct.
Checklist