Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for user limits #217

Merged

Conversation

aitorpazos
Copy link
Contributor

This PR addresses #216 and adds support for user limits feature which was added in RMQ 3.8.10.

It also adds functions to query vhost and user limits for all vhosts and users respectively.

Copy link
Owner

@michaelklishin michaelklishin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. This needs more work in order to be accepted.

Ω(err).Should(BeNil())
Ω(xs).Should(HaveLen(0))
})
It("sets the limits", func() {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This creates an example inter-dependency (one cannot pass without another being run first). This is not the case with other examples. If it would makes things easier, several examples can be combined.

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
## Changes Between 2.11.0 and 2.12.0 (unreleased)

No changes yet.
Added support to manage user limits.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not follow the formatting convention used in earlier releases. When in doubt, don't touch the change log at all.

michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2021
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit cb39760 into michaelklishin:master Nov 22, 2021
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Owner

I've addressed the feedback above and merged manually. Thank you for contributing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants