Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project Goals #6

Closed
alspore opened this issue Dec 25, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Project Goals #6

alspore opened this issue Dec 25, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@alspore
Copy link
Contributor

alspore commented Dec 25, 2014

Is the projects goal to rename libraries or implement their functionality in a new library?

Personally I think it would be a lot more helpful to migrate functions into a lovepg library rather than simply renaming stuff. So for example rather than renaming HUMP to LUMP we could just port the HUMP code to lovepg.state, lovepg.camera and so on.

@alspore alspore changed the title Refactored Naming Scheme Project Goals Dec 25, 2014
@micaiahparker
Copy link
Owner

I love the idea of a lovepg suite. If we go with this I think we should use anim8 over ANaL though, just personal preference.

@alspore
Copy link
Contributor Author

alspore commented Dec 25, 2014

If we make a lovepg suite, should libraries that don't need refactored names be included?

@micaiahparker
Copy link
Owner

If the purpose of LovePG is just to refactor names then no it shouldn't. But I think that love2d as a suite has the potential to be a sort of all-in-one library that also uses a naming scheme suitable for all audiences then I think we should use the best libraries. I don't know what recent changes have been made to ANaL, but in the past I believe anim8 was the superior library.

@alspore
Copy link
Contributor Author

alspore commented Dec 25, 2014

We should figure out what features we want before picking libraries to refactor. In #8 I go over some that I think are important.

@alspore
Copy link
Contributor Author

alspore commented Dec 26, 2014

Go see #8.

@alspore alspore closed this as completed Dec 26, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants