Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reuse the Metafacture Core .gitignore #353

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

TobiasNx
Copy link
Collaborator

https://github.com/metafacture/metafacture-core/blob/master/.gitignore

It is nicely formatted and added the files from the old .gitignore that were missing.

https://github.com/metafacture/metafacture-core/blob/master/.gitignore

It is nicely formatted and added the files from the old .gitignore that were missing.
@TobiasNx TobiasNx requested a review from fsteeg May 24, 2024 10:11
Copy link
Member

@blackwinter blackwinter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would ignore misc/bin/ which is a legitimate directory.

In general, I would prefer local peculiarities to be handled locally, i.e. .git/info/exclude (or global ignore file via core.excludesFile config).

In addition to that, the list seems to include a lot of outdated stuff.

@fsteeg
Copy link
Member

fsteeg commented May 24, 2024

In general, I would prefer local peculiarities to be handled locally, i.e. .git/info/exclude

Yes, makes sense. @TobiasNx here are some details on that:
https://github.com/github/docs/blob/main/content/get-started/getting-started-with-git/ignoring-files.md#excluding-local-files-without-creating-a-gitignore-file

@dr0i
Copy link
Member

dr0i commented May 24, 2024

Wasn't aware of .git/info/exclude - good thing 👍

@TobiasNx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

then closing

@TobiasNx TobiasNx closed this May 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants