Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[API Docs] update latest API docs #829

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

meshcloud-gh-actions[bot]
Copy link

The latest API docs from meshStack builds on the develop branch.

  • This PR is updated automatically with changes, until merged
  • Please remember merging this PR before starting the release workflow

Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-829.d17q6gob2fx97d.amplifyapp.com

@nroi nroi removed the vnext label Jun 19, 2024
@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch from 1c50617 to 556e57c Compare June 19, 2024 15:22
@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch 22 times, most recently from 0f31c40 to c83200b Compare June 25, 2024 09:07
@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch from d1ec89a to 57d504f Compare June 27, 2024 11:45
@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch 9 times, most recently from da8b6c6 to 4de0330 Compare July 1, 2024 15:24
@uleMeshcloud uleMeshcloud removed the vnext label Jul 1, 2024
@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch from 4de0330 to d701dce Compare July 1, 2024 15:45
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ <h4 id="mesh_object_declarative_import">meshObject Declarative Import</h4>
Vary: Access-Control-Request-Headers
Content-Type: application/vnd.meshcloud.api.meshobjects.v1+json
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
X-XSS-Protection: 0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sttomm can you review that whether this is related to library upgrades

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, it is related to upgrading to Spring Boot 3.0 (and especialyl Spring Security 6). Setting this header to 0 is the new recommendation by OWASP. So I think this change is a good one. It seems like the old default did more harm than good in the end. So it should be good, that it is set to 0 now. spring-projects/spring-security#9631

@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch 7 times, most recently from 14245c8 to ac018a6 Compare July 3, 2024 11:02
@meshcloud-gh-actions meshcloud-gh-actions bot force-pushed the feature/update-api-docs branch from ac018a6 to 9f6db2f Compare July 3, 2024 12:54
@Jelledb Jelledb added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit da29346 Jul 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@Jelledb Jelledb deleted the feature/update-api-docs branch July 3, 2024 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants