feat: Support custom JSON schema validation and string format checkers in targets

[edgarrmondragon]

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://meltano-sdk--1471.org.readthedocs.build/en/1471/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (dfcec5f) 85.05% compared to head (33b43a1) 87.94%.
Report is 276 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1471      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.05%   87.94%   +2.88%     
==========================================
  Files          58       59       +1     
  Lines        4845     7417    +2572     
  Branches      805     1642     +837     
==========================================
+ Hits         4121     6523    +2402     
- Misses        526      642     +116     
- Partials      198      252      +54     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[BuzzCutNorman]

@edgarrmondragon I like it so far. No format checking at all to start and then you can add checks as you need them. When working with this I added a default format checker that I knew would fail date and time. Then created a simple is_allowed function to get past the validation fail to see how the values filed.

    def get_format_checker(self) -> FormatChecker:
        format_checker: FormatChecker = Draft3Validator.FORMAT_CHECKER

        def is_allowed(value):
            return True

        format_checker.checks("time")(is_allowed)
        format_checker.checks("date")(is_allowed)
        return format_checker

[edgarrmondragon]

Related: #1831

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1471 will not alter performance

_{Comparing feat/custom-format-checkers (33b43a1) with main (b4a7b3e)}

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks

[edgarrmondragon]

@BuzzCutNorman Do you think this is still relevant? The original implementation was rather specific python-jsonschema so I wonder if we should keep it?

[BuzzCutNorman]

@edgarrmondragon If you would please clarify if the question of relevance is about test_format_checker.py or the PR in general?

[edgarrmondragon]

@BuzzCutNorman I commented on the file in the wrong PR 😅. I meant #2136 (comment)