Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120423 - RalfJung:indirect-structural-match…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…, r=petrochenkov

update indirect structural match lints to match RFC and to show up for dependencies

This is a large step towards implementing rust-lang/rfcs#3535.
We currently have five lints related to "the structural match situation":
- nontrivial_structural_match
- indirect_structural_match
- pointer_structural_match
- const_patterns_without_partial_eq
- illegal_floating_point_literal_pattern

This PR concerns the first 3 of them. (The 4th already is set up to show for dependencies, and the 5th is removed by rust-lang#116284.) nontrivial_structural_match is being removed as per the RFC; the other two are enabled to show up in dependencies.

Fixes rust-lang#73448 by removing the affected analysis.
  • Loading branch information
matthiaskrgr authored Feb 5, 2024
2 parents 9adcd19 + efbfb04 commit e01ee4c
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 30 changed files with 587 additions and 368 deletions.
29 changes: 1 addition & 28 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/check.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ use std::mem;
use std::ops::{ControlFlow, Deref};

use super::ops::{self, NonConstOp, Status};
use super::qualifs::{self, CustomEq, HasMutInterior, NeedsDrop, NeedsNonConstDrop};
use super::qualifs::{self, HasMutInterior, NeedsDrop, NeedsNonConstDrop};
use super::resolver::FlowSensitiveAnalysis;
use super::{ConstCx, Qualif};
use crate::const_eval::is_unstable_const_fn;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -149,37 +149,10 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> Qualifs<'mir, 'tcx> {

let return_loc = ccx.body.terminator_loc(return_block);

let custom_eq = match ccx.const_kind() {
// We don't care whether a `const fn` returns a value that is not structurally
// matchable. Functions calls are opaque and always use type-based qualification, so
// this value should never be used.
hir::ConstContext::ConstFn => true,

// If we know that all values of the return type are structurally matchable, there's no
// need to run dataflow.
// Opaque types do not participate in const generics or pattern matching, so we can safely count them out.
_ if ccx.body.return_ty().has_opaque_types()
|| !CustomEq::in_any_value_of_ty(ccx, ccx.body.return_ty()) =>
{
false
}

hir::ConstContext::Const { .. } | hir::ConstContext::Static(_) => {
let mut cursor = FlowSensitiveAnalysis::new(CustomEq, ccx)
.into_engine(ccx.tcx, ccx.body)
.iterate_to_fixpoint()
.into_results_cursor(ccx.body);

cursor.seek_after_primary_effect(return_loc);
cursor.get().contains(RETURN_PLACE)
}
};

ConstQualifs {
needs_drop: self.needs_drop(ccx, RETURN_PLACE, return_loc),
needs_non_const_drop: self.needs_non_const_drop(ccx, RETURN_PLACE, return_loc),
has_mut_interior: self.has_mut_interior(ccx, RETURN_PLACE, return_loc),
custom_eq,
tainted_by_errors,
}
}
Expand Down
32 changes: 1 addition & 31 deletions compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/qualifs.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ use rustc_middle::mir::*;
use rustc_middle::traits::BuiltinImplSource;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtDef, GenericArgsRef, Ty};
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{
self, ImplSource, Obligation, ObligationCause, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext,
ImplSource, Obligation, ObligationCause, ObligationCtxt, SelectionContext,
};

use super::ConstCx;
Expand All @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ pub fn in_any_value_of_ty<'tcx>(
has_mut_interior: HasMutInterior::in_any_value_of_ty(cx, ty),
needs_drop: NeedsDrop::in_any_value_of_ty(cx, ty),
needs_non_const_drop: NeedsNonConstDrop::in_any_value_of_ty(cx, ty),
custom_eq: CustomEq::in_any_value_of_ty(cx, ty),
tainted_by_errors,
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -213,35 +212,6 @@ impl Qualif for NeedsNonConstDrop {
}
}

/// A constant that cannot be used as part of a pattern in a `match` expression.
pub struct CustomEq;

impl Qualif for CustomEq {
const ANALYSIS_NAME: &'static str = "flow_custom_eq";

fn in_qualifs(qualifs: &ConstQualifs) -> bool {
qualifs.custom_eq
}

fn in_any_value_of_ty<'tcx>(cx: &ConstCx<'_, 'tcx>, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
// If *any* component of a composite data type does not implement `Structural{Partial,}Eq`,
// we know that at least some values of that type are not structural-match. I say "some"
// because that component may be part of an enum variant (e.g.,
// `Option::<NonStructuralMatchTy>::Some`), in which case some values of this type may be
// structural-match (`Option::None`).
traits::search_for_structural_match_violation(cx.body.span, cx.tcx, ty).is_some()
}

fn in_adt_inherently<'tcx>(
cx: &ConstCx<'_, 'tcx>,
def: AdtDef<'tcx>,
args: GenericArgsRef<'tcx>,
) -> bool {
let ty = Ty::new_adt(cx.tcx, def, args);
!ty.is_structural_eq_shallow(cx.tcx)
}
}

// FIXME: Use `mir::visit::Visitor` for the `in_*` functions if/when it supports early return.

/// Returns `true` if this `Rvalue` contains qualif `Q`.
Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_lint/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -516,6 +516,11 @@ fn register_builtins(store: &mut LintStore) {
"converted into hard error, see PR #118649 \
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118649> for more information",
);
store.register_removed(
"nontrivial_structural_match",
"no longer needed, see RFC #3535 \
<https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3535-constants-in-patterns.html> for more information",
);
}

fn register_internals(store: &mut LintStore) {
Expand Down
51 changes: 7 additions & 44 deletions compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
//! These are the built-in lints that are emitted direct in the main
//! compiler code, rather than using their own custom pass. Those
//! lints are all available in `rustc_lint::builtin`.
//!
//! When removing a lint, make sure to also add a call to `register_removed` in
//! compiler/rustc_lint/src/lib.rs.

use crate::{declare_lint, declare_lint_pass, FutureIncompatibilityReason};
use rustc_span::edition::Edition;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -67,7 +70,6 @@ declare_lint_pass! {
MUST_NOT_SUSPEND,
NAMED_ARGUMENTS_USED_POSITIONALLY,
NON_EXHAUSTIVE_OMITTED_PATTERNS,
NONTRIVIAL_STRUCTURAL_MATCH,
ORDER_DEPENDENT_TRAIT_OBJECTS,
OVERLAPPING_RANGE_ENDPOINTS,
PATTERNS_IN_FNS_WITHOUT_BODY,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2330,8 +2332,8 @@ declare_lint! {
Warn,
"constant used in pattern contains value of non-structural-match type in a field or a variant",
@future_incompatible = FutureIncompatibleInfo {
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseErrorDontReportInDeps,
reference: "issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62411>",
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps,
reference: "issue #120362 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120362>",
};
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2386,47 +2388,8 @@ declare_lint! {
Warn,
"pointers are not structural-match",
@future_incompatible = FutureIncompatibleInfo {
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseErrorDontReportInDeps,
reference: "issue #62411 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70861>",
};
}

declare_lint! {
/// The `nontrivial_structural_match` lint detects constants that are used in patterns,
/// whose type is not structural-match and whose initializer body actually uses values
/// that are not structural-match. So `Option<NotStructuralMatch>` is ok if the constant
/// is just `None`.
///
/// ### Example
///
/// ```rust,compile_fail
/// #![deny(nontrivial_structural_match)]
///
/// #[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
/// struct NoDerive(u32);
/// impl PartialEq for NoDerive { fn eq(&self, _: &Self) -> bool { false } }
/// impl Eq for NoDerive { }
/// fn main() {
/// const INDEX: Option<NoDerive> = [None, Some(NoDerive(10))][0];
/// match None { Some(_) => panic!("whoops"), INDEX => dbg!(INDEX), };
/// }
/// ```
///
/// {{produces}}
///
/// ### Explanation
///
/// Previous versions of Rust accepted constants in patterns, even if those constants' types
/// did not have `PartialEq` derived. Thus the compiler falls back to runtime execution of
/// `PartialEq`, which can report that two constants are not equal even if they are
/// bit-equivalent.
pub NONTRIVIAL_STRUCTURAL_MATCH,
Warn,
"constant used in pattern of non-structural-match type and the constant's initializer \
expression contains values of non-structural-match types",
@future_incompatible = FutureIncompatibleInfo {
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseErrorDontReportInDeps,
reference: "issue #73448 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73448>",
reason: FutureIncompatibilityReason::FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps,
reference: "issue #120362 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120362>",
};
}

Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/query.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -189,15 +189,14 @@ pub struct BorrowCheckResult<'tcx> {

/// The result of the `mir_const_qualif` query.
///
/// Each field (except `error_occurred`) corresponds to an implementer of the `Qualif` trait in
/// Each field (except `tainted_by_errors`) corresponds to an implementer of the `Qualif` trait in
/// `rustc_const_eval/src/transform/check_consts/qualifs.rs`. See that file for more information on each
/// `Qualif`.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Default, TyEncodable, TyDecodable, HashStable)]
pub struct ConstQualifs {
pub has_mut_interior: bool,
pub needs_drop: bool,
pub needs_non_const_drop: bool,
pub custom_eq: bool,
pub tainted_by_errors: Option<ErrorGuaranteed>,
}

Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit e01ee4c

Please sign in to comment.