This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Linearize calls to _generate_user_id #3029
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ | |
from synapse.http.client import CaptchaServerHttpClient | ||
from synapse import types | ||
from synapse.types import UserID | ||
from synapse.util.async import run_on_reactor | ||
from synapse.util.async import run_on_reactor, Linearizer | ||
from synapse.util.threepids import check_3pid_allowed | ||
from ._base import BaseHandler | ||
|
||
|
@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ def __init__(self, hs): | |
|
||
self.macaroon_gen = hs.get_macaroon_generator() | ||
|
||
self._generate_user_id_linearizer = Linearizer( | ||
name="_generate_user_id_linearizer", | ||
) | ||
|
||
@defer.inlineCallbacks | ||
def check_username(self, localpart, guest_access_token=None, | ||
assigned_user_id=None): | ||
|
@@ -345,9 +349,11 @@ def check_user_id_not_appservice_exclusive(self, user_id, allowed_appservice=Non | |
@defer.inlineCallbacks | ||
def _generate_user_id(self, reseed=False): | ||
if reseed or self._next_generated_user_id is None: | ||
self._next_generated_user_id = ( | ||
yield self.store.find_next_generated_user_id_localpart() | ||
) | ||
with (yield self._generate_user_id_linearizer.queue(())): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. surely we should have a test for There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Oops, yes! I've added a guard inside too, but kept the outer one for the fast path |
||
if reseed or self._next_generated_user_id is None: | ||
self._next_generated_user_id = ( | ||
yield self.store.find_next_generated_user_id_localpart() | ||
) | ||
|
||
id = self._next_generated_user_id | ||
self._next_generated_user_id += 1 | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the help of the twisted mailing list, I realised recently that our Linearizer is pretty inefficient, especially when you get lots of things queued up on it. In cases like this where you really just want to do a thing the first time we get to a bit of code, it's better to do it with a single Deferred that everything else hangs off:
(which is probably more-or-less equivalent to what some of our cache wrappers do)
having said that, if you feel disinclined to rewrite all this right now, I won't insist. Just I think we should bear it in mind for the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, we could use an
ObservableDeferred
here. I think with thereseed
logic it becomes a non-trivial rewrite, so I think I'll punt until we have a chance to look at how we should be doing this properly.