Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify how capabilities work in the c2s API #1829

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 31, 2019
Merged

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

Rendered: see 'docs' status check


Original proposals:

Implementation proof:

There is one change to MSC1753 which is included in this commit. MSC1804 remains unchanged. In the original proposal, the change password capability being present was an indication that password changes were possible. It was found that this doesn't really communicate the state very well to clients in that lack of a capability (or a 404, etc) would mean that users would erroneously not be able to change their passwords. A simple boolean flag was added to assist clients in detecting this capability.

Original proposals:
* #1753
* #1804

Implementation proof:
* matrix-org/synapse#4472
* matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk#830

There is one change to MSC1753 which is included in this commit. MSC1804 remains unchanged. In the original proposal, the change password capability being present was an indication that password changes were possible. It was found that this doesn't really communicate the state very well to clients in that lack of a capability (or a 404, etc) would mean that users would erroneously not be able to change their passwords. A simple boolean flag was added to assist clients in detecting this capability.
@turt2live turt2live requested a review from a team January 31, 2019 02:44
@turt2live
Copy link
Member Author

Ideally @richvdh would review this to ensure accuracy to the proposal (and approve of the minor change to the change password capability), however I'll take review from anyone in the client sphere.

Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants