Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax the requirement for a content-type on .well-known #1824

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2019

Conversation

richvdh
Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh commented Jan 29, 2019

The main reason for this is that Apache etc won't stick a content-type on by
default, because they don't know it's JSON, so requiring it seems like it will
require unnecessary hoop-humping for everyone who wants to use a .well-known.

The main reason for this is that Apache etc won't stick a content-type on by
default, because they don't know it's JSON, so requiring it seems like it will
require unnecessary hoop-humping for everyone who wants to use a .well-known.
Copy link
Member

@anoadragon453 anoadragon453 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved on the grounds that although this is for an MSC that has already passed FCP, this is a small change and pre-r0.

@richvdh richvdh merged commit de57d39 into master Jan 29, 2019
turt2live added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2019
Original proposals:
* #1708 (note: the JSON requirements were softened by #1824)
* #1711

Implementation proofs:
* matrix-org/synapse#4489
* No explicit PRs for MSC1711 could be found, however Synapse is known to implement it.

There are no intentional changes which differ from the proposals in this commit, however the author has relied upon various historical conversations outside of the proposals to gain the required context. Inaccuracies introduced by the author are purely accidental.
@afranke afranke deleted the rav/no_content_type_for_well_known branch September 22, 2021 10:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants