Add support for remote ollama

[ccreutzi]

No description provided.

[MiriamScharnke]

I am generally in favour of the design, but would like to talk about the new name-value argument (why have you chosen this, what alternatives have you considered, the normal design review stuff :) ) - I suspect "Endpoint" is a bit abstract and may be confusing to users who don't already know what it is.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.13%. Comparing base (d74ec2b) to head (761a843).
Report is 91 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #53      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.12%   97.13%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        1287     1292       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         1250     1255       +5     
  Misses         37       37              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vpapanasta]

Having a look in the updated doc after removing the "local" from there I am unsure it is very clear that we continue to support the existing local server functionality. @MiriamScharnke what are your thoughts on this. I would love if we could continue to highlight the fact that if the user does not define an Endpoint, the default behaviour is to connect to the local server "127.0.0.1:11434"