Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

markgrover / spark Public

forked from apache/spark

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 1
Star 0

Code
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

SPARK-9790: [yarn] [YARN] Expose in WebUI if NodeManager is the reason why executors were killed.#1

Closed

markgrover wants to merge 15 commits intoumastermarkgrover/spark:umasterfrom nm2markgrover/spark:nm2Copy head branch name to clipboard

+53-30

Conversation Commits15 (15)Checks Files changed

Commits

Commits on Aug 10, 2015

Testing some changes
markgrover
committed
Mixing things up a bit
markgrover
committed
Fixing a bug in the name of the message.
markgrover
committed
My code is YARN specific so make it so
markgrover
committed
Updating definitions to send reason. Now we have to use it somewhere
markgrover
committed
Added usage for reason
markgrover
committed
1. Adding reason to ExecutorLoss message
markgrover
committed
Trying to get rid of the ContainerExited message since it may be possible to achieve that via overloading the RemoveExecutor message
markgrover
committed
Revert "Trying to get rid of the ContainerExited message since it may be possible to achieve that via overloading the RemoveExecutor message"
markgrover
committed
Preserving some good changes from the reverted commit
markgrover
committed
Fixing scalastyle. Updating some tests
markgrover
committed

Commits on Aug 11, 2015

Added some logging
markgrover
committed
Getting rid of the extra ContainerRemoved message since it doesn't seem like it's neccessary
markgrover
committed
Updating the displayed error message
markgrover
committed
Minor updates
markgrover
committed

Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.