Better naming than 'tags'

[tmcw]

The raster-colorizer type is currently tags - not sure if this really makes sense - sure, it's tags, but lots of other things, like text placements, will be tags as well, and should have type checking so that you can't specify color stops as text placements and so on.

Types are also usually named by carto input rather than serialization.

Thinking a better name might be stops?

/cc @springmeyer

[artemp]

color-stops ?

On 27 March 2013 15:23, Dane Springmeyer [email protected] wrote:

Sounds good. I think the 'tags' term came from your original patch for
this support. If not I have no idea where they came from.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/49#issuecomment-15529818
.

[springmeyer]

+1 to color-stops

[springmeyer]

tags are still used internally. not actionable to change this without renewed need/interest. closing for now.