Alternative: use unveil rather than chroot+setuid #6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks. I'm on OpenBSD, too. But I don't use minimalist any more. As you notice, unveil() is less portable, so not really suitable as a master branch. |
|
I don't use minimalist any more.
A bit off-topic, but may I ask what you use now?
|
|
I don't manage any mailinglists anymore. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The code you have already is more portable than what's in this pull request, but I wanted to share this for anyone looking for an alternative to running the program as root. On OpenBSD I let OpenSMTPD spawn minimalist as the
_smtpduser. Then I useunveilrather thanchroot.