Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add methods to generate and configure TLS #9

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

madflojo
Copy link
Owner

@madflojo madflojo commented May 18, 2024

This pull request adds methods for generating a tls.Config with the CA configured and configuring a tls.Config with the Key Pair configured.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added ExampleUsage function to demonstrate certificate generation, HTTP server setup, and HTTPS request making.
    • Added ExampleNewCA function to demonstrate certificate generation and HTTP server setup.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced TLS configuration setup by introducing new methods for generating and configuring TLS settings.
    • Updated TLS configuration in test functions to use new methods for improved clarity and maintainability.
  • Chores

    • Introduced targets for running tests and benchmarks in the Go project Makefile.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes streamline the TLS configuration setup in the Go project by introducing new methods for generating and configuring TLS settings. The Makefile now includes targets for running tests and benchmarks, while the README.md and various test files have been updated to reflect the new TLS configuration methods. This enhances the maintainability and clarity of the code related to TLS setup and testing.

Changes

File Change Summary
Makefile Added tests and benchmarks targets for running tests with coverage and benchmarks in the Go project.
README.md Updated TLS configuration in TestFunc to use certs.ConfigureTLSConfig.
testcerts.go Added GenerateTLSConfig and ConfigureTLSConfig methods for TLS configuration.
testcerts_test.go Refactored TLS setup in tests and added ExampleUsage and ExampleNewCA functions.

🐇✨
In the realm of Go, we tweak and mend,
TLS setups now smoothly blend.
With tests and benchmarks, we pave the way,
For robust code, come what may.
Certificates in hand, secure we stand,
In this coded land, so grand.
🚀💻


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7f09672 and 2fe5749.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • testcerts.go (4 hunks)
  • testcerts_test.go (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Makefile
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (1)
README.md (1)

Near line 3: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 3 exclamation marks for a text that’s 1012 characters long)
Context: ...orkflows/go.yaml/badge.svg?branch=main) codecov Go Report Card [![Go Reference](https://pkg.go.dev/badge/...

GitHub Check Runs (1)
golangci failure (8)

testcerts_test.go: [failure] 434-434:
Error return value of w.Write is not checked (errcheck)


testcerts_test.go: [warning] 343-343:
unused-parameter: parameter 'rootCAs' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)


testcerts_test.go: [warning] 433-433:
unused-parameter: parameter 'r' seems to be unused, consider removing or renaming it as _ (revive)

Additional comments not posted (4)
README.md (1)

59-59: Update the TLS configuration to use the new certs.ConfigureTLSConfig method enhances maintainability by centralizing TLS setup.

testcerts_test.go (2)

377-377: The update to use certs.ConfigureTLSConfig for setting up TLSClientConfig centralizes the TLS configuration, which is a good practice for maintainability and consistency.


402-458: The addition of ExampleNewCA function is a valuable example for users to understand how to generate and use certificates with the new API. It demonstrates the entire process from certificate generation to making an HTTPS request.

testcerts.go (1)

305-315: The ConfigureTLSConfig method effectively encapsulates the configuration of tls.Config with the certificate and private key from KeyPair. This method enhances the flexibility and reusability of TLS configurations.

testcerts_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
testcerts.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@madflojo
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 18, 2024

Actions Performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fe5749 and 5be6d63.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • testcerts.go (8 hunks)
  • testcerts_test.go (3 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Learnings (1)
testcerts.go (1)
User: madflojo
PR: madflojo/testcerts#9
File: testcerts.go:234-238
Timestamp: 2024-05-18T15:25:20.697Z
Learning: The `GenerateTLSConfig` method in the `testcerts` library should not enforce a specific TLS version to maintain flexibility for testing different TLS configurations.
Additional comments not posted (5)
testcerts.go (3)

235-239: The GenerateTLSConfig method correctly provides a flexible TLS configuration setup, allowing for comprehensive testing across various environments. This approach is suitable given the context of a testing library.


306-316: The ConfigureTLSConfig method correctly sets up the TLS configuration with the certificate and private key. This is crucial for both client and server configurations in testing scenarios.


Line range hint 68-403: The implementations of certificate generation, key pair creation, and file operations are well-handled with appropriate error checks and clean-up procedures. These are crucial for the robustness of the testing library.

testcerts_test.go (2)

Line range hint 339-423: The TestFullFlow function effectively tests the end-to-end process of certificate generation, server setup, and HTTPS communication. It is comprehensive and covers the critical paths of the functionality.


Line range hint 1-338: The test cases are well-structured and cover both happy and unhappy paths, ensuring that the library handles various scenarios correctly. This thorough testing is essential for maintaining the reliability of the library.

Also applies to: 424-483

@madflojo madflojo merged commit 34930f4 into main May 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@madflojo madflojo deleted the tlsconfig-helpers branch May 18, 2024 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant