Improving code coverage

[madflojo]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests

  • Expanded certificate generation tests to cover scenarios with no domain, single domain, and multiple domains.

• Chores

  • Adjusted code coverage target from 75% to 70%.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve two main changes: adjusting the coverage target in the codecov.yml configuration file from 75% to 70%, and expanding the functionality of the GenerateCerts function in the gencerts_test.go file to support generating certificates with different domain configurations. This includes adding three new test cases to ensure comprehensive testing of the certificate generation process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
codecov.yml	Adjusted the coverage target from 75% to 70%.
gencerts_test.go	Expanded GenerateCerts function to support multiple domain configurations and added three new test cases.

🐰
In the land of code so bright,
Coverage dipped, but all's alright.
Certificates now grow in might,
Domains aplenty, day and night.
Hopping through the code we go,
With tests to make our progress show.
🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (9)

gencerts_test.go (9)

10-19: Ensure consistent error messages for better maintainability.

Consider using a constant or a helper function for the error message format to ensure consistency and ease of maintenance.

---

21-30: Ensure consistent error messages for better maintainability.

Consider using a constant or a helper function for the error message format to ensure consistency and ease of maintenance.

---

32-41: Ensure consistent error messages for better maintainability.

Consider using a constant or a helper function for the error message format to ensure consistency and ease of maintenance.

---

Line range hint 42-69: Consider adding cleanup for temporary directories in unhappy paths.

Ensure that os.RemoveAll(tempDir) is called in all paths, including when errors occur early in the test cases. This can be achieved by moving the cleanup to a defer statement immediately after the directory creation.

---

Line range hint 70-98: Consider adding cleanup for temporary directories in unhappy paths.

Ensure that os.RemoveAll(tempDir) is called in all paths, including when errors occur early in the test cases. This can be achieved by moving the cleanup to a defer statement immediately after the directory creation.

---

Line range hint 99-127: Consider adding cleanup for temporary directories in unhappy paths.

Ensure that os.RemoveAll(tempDir) is called in all paths, including when errors occur early in the test cases. This can be achieved by moving the cleanup to a defer statement immediately after the directory creation.

---

Line range hint 128-156: Consider adding cleanup for temporary files in unhappy paths.

Ensure that temporary files are removed in all paths, including when errors occur early in the test cases. This can be achieved by moving the cleanup to a defer statement immediately after the file creation.

---

Line range hint 157-165: Consider adding cleanup for temporary files in unhappy paths.

Ensure that temporary files are removed in all paths, including when errors occur early in the test cases. This can be achieved by moving the cleanup to a defer statement immediately after the file creation.

---

Line range hint 166-184: Consider adding cleanup for temporary files in unhappy paths.

Ensure that temporary files are removed in all paths, including when errors occur early in the test cases. This can be achieved by moving the cleanup to a defer statement immediately after the file creation.

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6cbade and 6284b07.

Files selected for processing (2)

• codecov.yml (1 hunks)
• gencerts_test.go (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• codecov.yml