Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

py-commonmark: new port #8657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2020
Merged

py-commonmark: new port #8657

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2020

Conversation

harens
Copy link
Member

@harens harens commented Oct 6, 2020

Description

In the hopes of adding rich to MacPorts (which is now possible thanks to python-poetry/poetry#1975), I wrote a portfile for one of its dependencies.

Type(s)
  • bugfix
  • enhancement
  • security fix
Tested on

macOS 10.15.6 19G73
Xcode 12.0 12A7209

Verification

Have you

  • followed our Commit Message Guidelines?
  • squashed and minimized your commits?
  • checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same change?
  • referenced existing tickets on Trac with full URL?
  • checked your Portfile with port lint?
  • tried existing tests with sudo port test?
  • tried a full install with sudo port -vst install?
  • tested basic functionality of all binary files?

@macportsbot
Copy link

Travis Build #14402 Passed.

Lint results
--->  Verifying Portfile for py-commonmark
--->  0 errors and 0 warnings found.

Port py38-commonmark success on xcode10.3. Log
Port py-commonmark success on xcode10.3. Log
Port py38-commonmark success on xcode9.4. Log
Port py-commonmark success on xcode9.4. Log
Port py38-commonmark success on xcode8.3. Log
Port py-commonmark success on xcode8.3. Log
Port py38-commonmark success on xcode7.3. Log
Port py-commonmark success on xcode7.3. Log

@ryandesign ryandesign merged commit 563222b into macports:master Oct 6, 2020
@harens harens deleted the py-commonmark branch October 7, 2020 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants