Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update roles.yaml #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2020
Merged

update roles.yaml #63

merged 1 commit into from
May 15, 2020

Conversation

nwalens
Copy link
Contributor

@nwalens nwalens commented May 15, 2020

As a fix for #41 the operator now creates service accounts based on parameters or Custom Resource names. For that behaviour to be correct, the roles have to include the required permissions.

As mentioned in #52 the operator will now create service accounts based on parameters or Custom Resource names, for that the operator role has to include service account resources.
Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Many thanks!!

@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

I'll run some tests and update the CSV in your PR so we can launch 0.2.1 ASAP. Have you tested in which env?

@ricardozanini ricardozanini added the bug 🐛 Something isn't working label May 15, 2020
@ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

I'll merge this one and send another with the other updates in the manifest. Thanks again!

@nwalens
Copy link
Contributor Author

nwalens commented May 18, 2020

sorry didn't see the reply during the weekend. I had tested the role in a Openshift 4.3.8 cluster and it seemed to work.

Thanks a lot!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants