Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[aggregator] CanLead for unflushed window takes BufferPast into account #3328

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 5, 2021

Conversation

linasm
Copy link
Collaborator

@linasm linasm commented Mar 5, 2021

What this PR does / why we need it:
#2818 introduced a special case handling for resolution windows that have not been flushed yet by the leader, but it did not take BufferPast into account for timed metrics.
This PR adds the logics to take BufferPast into account for timed metrics.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing and/or backwards incompatible change?:
NONE

Does this PR require updating code package or user-facing documentation?:
NONE

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3328 (7038cda) into master (7038cda) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3328   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    72.4%    72.4%           
=======================================
  Files        1099     1099           
  Lines      102010   102010           
=======================================
  Hits        73923    73923           
  Misses      22995    22995           
  Partials     5092     5092           
Flag Coverage Δ
aggregator 76.3% <0.0%> (ø)
cluster 84.9% <0.0%> (ø)
collector 84.3% <0.0%> (ø)
dbnode 78.9% <0.0%> (ø)
m3em 74.4% <0.0%> (ø)
m3ninx 73.5% <0.0%> (ø)
metrics 19.8% <0.0%> (ø)
msg 74.1% <0.0%> (ø)
query 67.4% <0.0%> (ø)
x 80.5% <0.0%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7038cda...507b724. Read the comment docs.

@vdarulis vdarulis requested a review from abliqo March 5, 2021 16:33
Copy link
Collaborator

@robskillington robskillington left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@abliqo
Copy link
Collaborator

abliqo commented Mar 5, 2021

LGTM - thanks for adding that!

@linasm linasm merged commit 397b095 into master Mar 5, 2021
@linasm linasm deleted the linasm/unflushed-window-can-lead-with-buffer-past branch March 5, 2021 19:48
soundvibe added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2021
* master: (22 commits)
  Remove deprecated fields (#3327)
  Add quotas to Permits (#3333)
  [aggregator] Drop messages that have a drop policy applied (#3341)
  Fix NPE due to race with a closing series (#3056)
  [coordinator] Apply auto-mapping rules if-and-only-if no drop policies are in effect (#3339)
  [aggregator] Add validation in AddTimedWithStagedMetadatas (#3338)
  [coordinator] Fix panic in Ready endpoint for admin coordinator (#3335)
  [instrument] Config option to emit detailed Go runtime metrics only (#3332)
  [aggregator] Sort heap in one go, instead of iterating one-by-one (#3331)
  [pool] Add support for dynamic, sync.Pool backed, object pools (#3334)
  Enable PANIC_ON_INVARIANT_VIOLATED for tests (#3326)
  [aggregator] CanLead for unflushed window takes BufferPast into account (#3328)
  Optimize StagedMetadatas conversion (#3330)
  [m3msg] Improve message scan performance (#3319)
  [dbnode] Add reason tag to bootstrap retries metric (#3317)
  [coordinator] Enable rule filtering on prom metric type (#3325)
  Update m3dbnode-all-config.yml (#3204)
  [coordinator] Include Type in RollupOp.Equal (#3322)
  [coordinator] Simplify iteration logic of matchRollupTarget (#3321)
  [coordinator] Add rollup type to remove specific dimensions (#3318)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants