-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 455
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[coordinator] Store metrics type into the annotation #2628
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
78783c8
Rename existing protobuf TimeSeries.type field to m3_type to avoid co…
linasm cc62479
Add new Prometheus protobuf fields
linasm 27f7f23
Rename the internal MetricsType to M3MetricsType
linasm 62f4bfd
Implement conversions
linasm 06d5f81
Write metrics type as annotation payload
linasm aeb8036
Merge branch 'master' into linasm/metrics-type-metadata
linasm 521a732
Avoid reusing annotation slices
linasm ced1245
Merge branch 'master' into linasm/metrics-type-metadata
linasm 08d50fb
Fix test
linasm d108b4f
Introduce metric family type
linasm 7cb1bf6
Merge branch 'master' into linasm/metrics-type-metadata
linasm 70124bf
Address review feedback
linasm 7e1ea81
Merge branch 'master' into linasm/metrics-type-metadata
linasm a287fba
Merge branch 'master' into linasm/metrics-type-metadata
linasm 77753b9
Revert "Introduce metric family type"
linasm 1466bf7
Introduce annotation.Payload.handle_value_resets field
linasm b4dc990
Merge branch 'master' into linasm/metrics-type-metadata
linasm 3eb2ad0
Minor changes according to PR feedback
linasm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we keep this as MetricType
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, we can. But I renamed it in order to match
PromMetricType
in https://github.com/m3db/m3/pull/2628/files/aeb8036681303b0de6312eb47006d49f59a4a631#diff-0535bd9002d5b34759706aebeec1ee46I believe having
PromMetricType
and justMetricType
at the same scope/level would be confusing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My thinking was that
MetricType
is implicitly scoped toM3MetricType
just because we're in the M3 project, so all types can be consideredM3Type
by defaultThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wish it were so simple :) Unfortunately we bring in a protobuf with a different
MetricType
from Prometheus project which makes this whole point moot.