-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve ludwig feature dict #3904
Open
dennisrall
wants to merge
12
commits into
ludwig-ai:master
Choose a base branch
from
dennisrall:improve-ludwig-feature-dict
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c27d50d
tests: split test into multiple tests
dennisrall f8d7982
feat: improvate implementation of feature dict
dennisrall 9dc7ef8
feat: use MutableMapping of collections.abc for feature dict
dennisrall 4ca184a
tests: add tests for the key-name mapping methods
dennisrall c5dcda9
feat: use static hash value for feature dict
dennisrall 3edaa08
refactor: remove list methods
dennisrall cd36fed
docs: add docstrings to tests and to hash func
dennisrall 4a9aa22
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:ludwig-ai/ludwig into improve-lud…
justinxzhao 326c40d
Upgrade integration tests to use torch 2.1.0.
justinxzhao 1c685cf
Merge branch 'ludwig-ai:master' into improve-ludwig-feature-dict
dennisrall 23a2da7
Try adding sox to requirements.
justinxzhao acfa198
Merge branch 'ludwig-ai:master' into improve-ludwig-feature-dict
dennisrall File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dennisrall Thank you for incorporating my previous suggestion -- I think that part looks clean now. Thank you for the idea and the implementation!
For this one, I am not sure if the benefits due to adding the MutableMapping subclassing justify taking the risk brought about the multiple inheritance. Do the test cover all the eventualities that might happen with this change?
Thank you. /cc @justinxzhao @arnavgarg1 @Infernaught
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem, I was just playing around a bit.
I can't think of any problems about the multiple inheritance, but you know the code better than me😉
It is also possible to remove the
MutableMapping
inheritance and implement the other methods by hand. But I think this way it is a bit cleaner, if it doesn't cause any problems...