Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Communication: Fix scrolling error for long messages #9997

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Merge branch 'develop' into bugfix/communication/fix-scrolling-error-…

97cd0a2
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Sign in for the full log view
Merged

Communication: Fix scrolling error for long messages #9997

Merge branch 'develop' into bugfix/communication/fix-scrolling-error-…
97cd0a2
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
GitHub Actions / Junit Results failed Dec 13, 2024 in 0s

Junit Results

Junit Results ran 8541 in 1309.9410000000003 seconds 0 Errored, 3 Failed, 1 Skipped

Annotations

Check failure on line 0 in test

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

test#L0 

Junit Results ran 8541 in 1309.9410000000003 seconds 0 Errored, 3 Failed, 1 Skipped

Check failure on line 0 in /home/runner/work/Artemis/Artemis/src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/assessment/ResultListenerIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

updateExercisePoints_ShouldUpdatePointsInParticipantScores(boolean) [2] isTeamTest=false 

Junit test updateExercisePoints_ShouldUpdatePointsInParticipantScores(boolean) [2] isTeamTest=false failed org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: 
expected: 200.0
 but was: 20.0
Raw output 
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: 
expected: 200.0
 but was: 20.0
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.assessment.ResultListenerIntegrationTest.updateExercisePoints_ShouldUpdatePointsInParticipantScores(ResultListenerIntegrationTest.java:121)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:184)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$2$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:179)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:184)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:184)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.accept(ForEachOps.java:184)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.Spliterators$ArraySpliterator.forEachRemaining(Spliterators.java:1024)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:151)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:174)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
	at [email protected]/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1708)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:151)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:174)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:197)
	at [email protected]/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1708)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:151)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:174)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:276)
	at [email protected]/java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1708)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:509)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:499)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:151)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(ForEachOps.java:174)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234)
	at [email protected]/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(ReferencePipeline.java:596)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)

Check failure on line 695 in /home/runner/work/Artemis/Artemis/src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/communication/MessageIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

testDecreaseUnreadMessageCountWhenDeletingMessage() 

Junit test testDecreaseUnreadMessageCountWhenDeletingMessage() failed org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: 
expected: 0L
 but was: 1L
Raw output 
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: 
expected: 0L
 but was: 1L
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.communication.MessageIntegrationTest.lambda$testDecreaseUnreadMessageCountWhenDeletingMessage$28(MessageIntegrationTest.java:725)
	at app//org.awaitility.core.AssertionCondition.lambda$new$0(AssertionCondition.java:53)
	at app//org.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter$ConditionPoller.call(ConditionAwaiter.java:248)
	at app//org.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter$ConditionPoller.call(ConditionAwaiter.java:235)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:317)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1144)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:642)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)

Check failure on line 144 in /home/runner/work/Artemis/Artemis/src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java

See this annotation in the file changed.

@github-actions github-actions / Junit Results

testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack() 

Junit test testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack() failed org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 2L
 but was: 1L
Raw output 
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [There are more server sessions activated than expected.] 
expected: 2L
 but was: 1L
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.clientConnectToArtemisSshServer(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:212)
	at app//de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icl.LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.testConnectOverSshAndReceivePack(LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java:145)
	at [email protected]/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at [email protected]/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)
View more details on GitHub Actions