Skip to content

Comparing array search: 'old stiyle' linear look up vs blocks

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

loghound/SpeedCompare

Repository files navigation

One of the niftier things in Snow Leopard are blocks -- It's a way to encapsulate a bit of code and pass it around to do useful things.

I won't go into the hairy details but suffice to say it lets you do some interesting design. Recently I was faced with the problem of looking through a 'large (30,000+) array of strings to find matchess. The simple 'containsObject' feature of NSArray was "ok" but slows down as the size increases.

As an experiment I thought to write a version that use blocks and concurrent searching. NSArray has a enumerateObjectsWithOptions:usingBlock: method that exactly fit the bill.

So... replace:

foundIt=[self.items containsObject:itemToFind]

with

[self.items enumerateObjectsWithOptions:NSEnumerationConcurrent
usingBlock:^(id s,NSUInteger idx,BOOL *stop){

   if ([(NSString*)s isEqual:itemToFind]) {
   foundIt=TRUE;
   *stop=TRUE;
   }
return;  
}]; 

The results? I tried 4 experiments for a variety of sizes.

In every case the blocks version was faster for ~8000 elements or more (below 8000, the startup costs of blocks are too much) -- These results are on a 8 core mac pro so it's possible it could be worse on a dual core machine but the result would be the same -- at some point there the blocks version will win.

chart comparison

Link to the spreadsheet with detailed results:

About

Comparing array search: 'old stiyle' linear look up vs blocks

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published