Configuration file should be named .ls-lint.yaml

[blfpd]

The extension .yaml should be preferred over .yml, in a similar way we use .html instead of .htm.

[loeffel-io]

Hey @batisteo,

thank you for your contribution!

I personally do prefer yml instead of yaml but i will take care about that in v2 by ls-lint -f .ls-lint.yaml.

[blfpd]

Cool

From https://yaml.org/faq.html:

Is there an official extension for YAML files?
Please use ".yaml" when possible.

[id-ekaagr]

how about picking c as config file argument? ls-lint -c .ls-lint.yaml ls-lint --config .ls-lint.yaml and not ls-lint -f .ls-lint.yaml?

[yuhr]

Why not allow both by default? I mean, pick the one which is present at the current directory. If both exists, I think it should simply abort, because then ls-lint can't tell which one is actually intended by the user. I'm afraid of that linting is accidentally passing or failing by this kind of implicit preference.

[loeffel-io]

With v2.x this is provided by the config option: https://github.com/loeffel-io/ls-lint/releases/tag/v2.0.0-beta.0

Feel free to try it out