-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow --no-web together with --master for automation #333
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally I prefer
--min-slaves
as it better communicates what the behavior is. Since you can have greater than the number of expected slaves with this implementation. See https://github.com/locustio/locust/pull/372/files#diff-6f782ed63a6a642694db58c0d5cdd932R125There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't the current implementation start close to immediately once the min slave count has been reached? If so, how would I go about to start a test with more slaves than min_slaves (other than just spawning them all at the same time and hoping that they would connect before the the poll check)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it would but I think that's the behavior I would expect. I think most people using this feature would bring up the master process specifying
--min-slaves 10
, then bring up 10 slave processes to connect to the master. If I wanted 11 slaves, I would simply indicate--min-slaves 11
. However if I thought I wanted 10 slaves, but later realized I need 11 slaves to reach my desired throughput, then I could add another 1 slave after the original 10 slaves have already started swarming.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case I think i'd still prefer
--num-slaves
or--expected-slave-count
. Though it might be bikeshedding, and I'm fine with--min-slaves
as well :).That would require us to have some kind of automatic re-balancing of simulated users when new slaves connect.