-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a hash of hash response to Heartcheck #33
Conversation
Hello, @LuccaRosa! This is your first Pull Request that will be reviewed by SourceLevel, an automatic Code Review service. It will leave comments on this diff with potential issues and style violations found in the code as you push new commits. You can also see all the issues found on this Pull Request on its review page. Please check our documentation for more information. |
0f33690
to
a52761d
Compare
Add a hash of hash response to Heartcheck
a52761d
to
534f6b2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LuccaRosa I think it is missing to comment about this new configuration on README and mention this change on CHANGELOG
89f4555
to
b8dbb74
Compare
b8dbb74
to
5cac1b2
Compare
5cac1b2
to
8fd2e43
Compare
Salve galera, podemos mergear esse PR? Acredito que ele vai possibilitar algumas customizações legais que a gente pode querer fazer aqui na empresa :) |
SourceLevel has finished reviewing this Pull Request and has found:
|
This feature allows the user to choose between a JSON response with hashes
{ "Some Check": { "status": "ok", "time": 123.45}}
and with an array[{"Some check": { "status": "ok"}, "time": 123.45}]
using the boolean argumenthash_response
at the setup.