Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename TorchToStd pass as TorchToArith #1163

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

u99127
Copy link
Contributor

@u99127 u99127 commented Aug 5, 2022

This moves the TorchToStd pass as TorchToArith. Unable to find the suitable unicode character as on the ticket :)

A quick read through the converters in this pass appear to create ops from the arith dialect. Hence the full rename.

Fix GH Issue #409.

@sjarus , @silvasean

@silvasean
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, thanks!

@u99127
Copy link
Contributor Author

u99127 commented Aug 8, 2022

Is there a protocol to merging ? I'm assuming once approved by someone with adequate reviewing powers we are ok merging ?

Ramana

@silvasean
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, go ahead and merge after it is marked "approved" on github and all comments are addressed.

All the converters in this pass appear to create ops from the
arith dialect. Hence the full rename.

Fix GH Issue llvm#409.
@u99127 u99127 merged commit 738f4fe into llvm:main Aug 10, 2022
u99127 pushed a commit to u99127/torch-mlir that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
The CI didn't catch the missing rename of TorchToArith until the
merge had happened. This is following up from llvm#1163
sjain-stanford pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
The CI didn't catch the missing rename of TorchToArith until the
merge had happened. This is following up from #1163
qedawkins pushed a commit to nod-ai/torch-mlir that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
* ExecutionSession constructor without entry function name

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* clang-format

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* Do not use run_main_graph in ExecutionSession

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* Revise

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* Add omEntryPointName to pass Windows CI

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* Address review comments

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* Use run_main_graph as the default entry point

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* undo numerical.def

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

* Change messages

Signed-off-by: Tung D. Le <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Alexandre Eichenberger <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants