-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release/18.x: [RISCV][ISel] Fix types in tryFoldSelectIntoOp
(#90659)
#90682
Conversation
@topperc What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 2647bd7 Requested by: @dtcxzyw Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90682.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index a0cec426002b6f..d46093b9e260a2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -14559,7 +14559,7 @@ static SDValue tryFoldSelectIntoOp(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
SDLoc DL(N);
SDValue OtherOp = TrueVal.getOperand(1 - OpToFold);
- EVT OtherOpVT = OtherOp->getValueType(0);
+ EVT OtherOpVT = OtherOp.getValueType();
SDValue IdentityOperand =
DAG.getNeutralElement(Opc, DL, OtherOpVT, N->getFlags());
if (!Commutative)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr90652.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr90652.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..2162395b92ac3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr90652.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv64 | FileCheck %s
+
+define i1 @test(i64 %x, i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: addi a3, a0, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: slt a0, a3, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT: not a1, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT: and a0, a1, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT: or a0, a2, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %sadd = call { i64, i1 } @llvm.sadd.with.overflow.i64(i64 %x, i64 1)
+ %ov = extractvalue { i64, i1 } %sadd, 1
+ %or = or i1 %cond2, %ov
+ %sel = select i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2, i1 %or
+ ret i1 %sel
+}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
``` SelectionDAG has 17 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t6: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %2 t8: i1 = truncate t6 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t7: i1 = truncate t4 t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t10: i64,i1 = saddo t2, Constant:i64<1> t11: i1 = or t8, t10:1 t12: i1 = select t7, t8, t11 t13: i64 = any_extend t12 t15: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $x10, t13 t16: ch = RISCVISD::RET_GLUE t15, Register:i64 $x10, t15:1 ``` `OtherOpVT` should be i1, but `OtherOp->getValueType(0)` returns `i64`, which ignores `ResNo` in `SDValue`. Fix llvm#90652. (cherry picked from commit 2647bd7)
Hi @dtcxzyw (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
Fixed an incorrect type inference during RISC-V instruction selection, which causes an assertion failure when trying to fold selects into their operands. |
Backport 2647bd7
Requested by: @dtcxzyw