-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RISCV] Make sure ADDI replacement in optimizeCondBranch has a virtual reg destination. #81938
Conversation
We're can replace a virtual register ADDI with an ADDI with a physical register destination. We don't check if its safe to extend the live range of a phyical register so we shouldn't do this.
…l reg destination.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Craig Topper (topperc) ChangesIf it isn't virtual, we may extend the live range of the physical register past were it is valid. For example, across a call. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81938.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
index 225a9db8f3ee11..af7c40d0ca1ec6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
@@ -1228,7 +1228,8 @@ bool RISCVInstrInfo::optimizeCondBranch(MachineInstr &MI) const {
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator II(&MI), E = MBB->rend();
auto DefC1 = std::find_if(++II, E, [&](const MachineInstr &I) -> bool {
int64_t Imm;
- return isLoadImm(&I, Imm) && Imm == C1;
+ return isLoadImm(&I, Imm) && Imm == C1 &&
+ I.getOperand(0).getReg().isVirtual();
});
if (DefC1 != E)
return DefC1->getOperand(0).getReg();
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/branch-opt.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/branch-opt.mir
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..ba3a20f2fbfcd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/branch-opt.mir
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+# RUN: llc %s -mtriple=riscv64 -run-pass=peephole-opt -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+# Make sure we shouldn't replace the %2 ADDI with the $x10 ADDI since it has a
+# physical register destination.
+
+--- |
+ define void @foo(i32 signext %0) {
+ tail call void @bar(i32 1)
+ %2 = icmp ugt i32 %0, 1
+ br i1 %2, label %3, label %4
+
+ 3: ; preds = %1
+ tail call void @bar(i32 3)
+ ret void
+
+ 4: ; preds = %1
+ ret void
+ }
+
+ declare void @bar(...)
+
+...
+---
+name: foo
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+body: |
+ ; CHECK-LABEL: name: foo
+ ; CHECK: bb.0 (%ir-block.1):
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: successors: %bb.1(0x40000000), %bb.2(0x40000000)
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: liveins: $x10
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:gpr = COPY $x10
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, implicit-def dead $x2, implicit $x2
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: $x10 = ADDI $x0, 1
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: PseudoCALL target-flags(riscv-call) @bar, csr_ilp32_lp64, implicit-def dead $x1, implicit $x10, implicit-def $x2
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, implicit-def dead $x2, implicit $x2
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADDI:%[0-9]+]]:gpr = ADDI $x0, 2
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: BLTU [[COPY]], killed [[ADDI]], %bb.2
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: PseudoBR %bb.1
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: bb.1 (%ir-block.3):
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: $x10 = ADDI $x0, 3
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @bar, implicit $x2, implicit $x10
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: bb.2 (%ir-block.4):
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: PseudoRET
+ bb.0 (%ir-block.1):
+ successors: %bb.1, %bb.2
+ liveins: $x10
+
+ %0:gpr = COPY $x10
+ ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, implicit-def dead $x2, implicit $x2
+ $x10 = ADDI $x0, 1
+ PseudoCALL target-flags(riscv-call) @bar, csr_ilp32_lp64, implicit-def dead $x1, implicit $x10, implicit-def $x2
+ ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, implicit-def dead $x2, implicit $x2
+ %2:gpr = ADDI $x0, 2
+ BLTU %0, killed %2, %bb.2
+ PseudoBR %bb.1
+
+ bb.1 (%ir-block.3):
+ $x10 = ADDI $x0, 3
+ PseudoTAIL target-flags(riscv-call) @bar, implicit $x2, implicit $x10
+
+ bb.2 (%ir-block.4):
+ PseudoRET
+
+...
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…l reg destination. (llvm#81938) If it isn't virtual, we may extend the live range of the physical register past were it is valid. For example, across a call. Found while trying to enable -riscv-enable-sink-fold which enables some copy propagation in machine sink that led to ADDIs with physical register destinations. (cherry picked from commit feee627)
…l reg destination. (llvm#81938) If it isn't virtual, we may extend the live range of the physical register past were it is valid. For example, across a call. Found while trying to enable -riscv-enable-sink-fold which enables some copy propagation in machine sink that led to ADDIs with physical register destinations. (cherry picked from commit feee627)
If it isn't virtual, we may extend the live range of the physical register past were it is valid. For example, across a call.
Found while trying to enable -riscv-enable-sink-fold which enables some copy propagation in machine sink that led to ADDIs with physical register destinations.