[llgo] Building error: argument of incompatible type #100
Labels
Comments
xaionaro
changed the title
|
If I remove |
|
When I work-around this stuff a face problems with undefined constants and: It looks like UPD: Now trying to compile commit UPD2: It does not work, too (the same problem). |
|
Seems to be a duplicate of: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llgo-dev/e_qUcEzTgXs |
|
|
I don't think llgo is alive for a while. So, I would suggest you either fix these issues and submit patches or not spend your time on this. Maybe we'd need to remove llgo sooner than later :) |
Before considering fixing it I need to understand how useful llgo could be. If it will help to essentially reduce the size of a binary (compiled from Go source codes) then it is quite likely. But right now I just need to get it work somehow just to make the measurements. If you have somewhere at least one binary-release with prebuilt |
|
Note that last non-trivial commit there was more than 2 years ago. |
Bigcheese
pushed a commit
to Bigcheese/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2020
[dsymutil] Add DW_TAG_common_block to dieNeedsChildrenToBeMeaningful
jamesmth
pushed a commit
to jamesmth/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Dec 5, 2022
While probing stack, the stack register is moved without dwarf information, which could cause panic if unwind the backtrace. This commit only add annotation for the inline stack probe case. Dwarf information for the loop case should be done in another patch and need further discussion. Reviewed By: nagisa Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99579 Co-authored-by: YangKeao <[email protected]>
|
llgo is not in the repo anymore. |
EugeneZelenko
added
build-problem
and removed
llvm-tools
cuviper
pushed a commit
to cuviper/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Aug 27, 2023
While probing stack, the stack register is moved without dwarf information, which could cause panic if unwind the backtrace. This commit only add annotation for the inline stack probe case. Dwarf information for the loop case should be done in another patch and need further discussion. Reviewed By: nagisa Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99579 Co-authored-by: YangKeao <[email protected]>
TIFitis
pushed a commit
to TIFitis/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Jun 18, 2024
llvm#100) * [flang][OpenMP] Document `do concurent` mapping status and next steps Adds a doc to document the current status of `do concurent` mapping, its limitation, and potential next steps. * handle review comments
RevySR
pushed a commit
to revyos/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Jul 27, 2024
…mnor/vmxnor/vmclr/vmset/vmmv/vmnot` (llvm#100) * [Clang][XTHeadVector] Implement 16.1 `vmand{n}/vmnand/vmxor/vmor{n}/vmnor/vmxnor` * [Clang][XTHeadVector] Test 16.1 `vmand{n}/vmnand/vmxor/vmor{n}/vmnor/vmxnor` * [Clang][XTHeadVector] Test 16.1 `vmand{n}/vmnand/vmxor/vmor{n}/vmnor/vmxnor` * [Clang][XTHeadVector] Implement wrappers 16.1 `vmand{n}/vmnand/vmxor/vmor{n}/vmnor/vmxnor`
alexanderguy
pushed a commit
to alexanderguy/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Sep 25, 2024
changkhothuychung
pushed a commit
to changkhothuychung/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2024
…n't currently matter) (llvm#100) Co-authored-by: Daisy Hollman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello.
Results into:
On Debian Buster.
The failed command is:
It would've been nice to know which code-line (of the
runtimepackage) causes this error.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: