wrong format for size_t in dev_dbg() #147
Comments
|
Thanks! This is something you should submit to https://github.com/linux-surface/intel-precise-touch though. The kernel code is based on that. |
StollD
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2024
…find_and_get_node_by_id() [ Upstream commit 4207b55 ] The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock. This can lead to deadlocks as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF programs including e.g. the ones that attach to functions which are holding the scheduler rq lock. Consider the following BPF program: SEC("fentry/__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked") int BPF_PROG(__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked, struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *affn_ctx, struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(p->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn->id); if (cgrp) { bpf_printk("%d[%s] in %s", p->pid, p->comm, cgrp->kn->name); bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp); } return 0; } __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() is called with rq lock held and the above BPF program calls bpf_cgroup_from_id() within leading to the following lockdep warning: ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.7.0-rc3-work-00053-g07124366a1d7-dirty #147 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- repro/1620 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffffffff833b3688 (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 and this task is already holding: ffff888237ced698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: task_rq_lock+0x4e/0xf0 which would create a new lock dependency: (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} ... Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kernfs_idr_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&rq->__lock); lock(kernfs_idr_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); *** DEADLOCK *** ... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x781/0x2a40 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 cgroup_get_from_id+0x21/0x240 bpf_cgroup_from_id+0xe/0x20 bpf_prog_98652316e9337a5a___set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x96/0x11a bpf_trampoline_6442545632+0x4f/0x1000 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x5/0x5a0 sched_setaffinity+0x1b3/0x290 __x64_sys_sched_setaffinity+0x4f/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e Let's fix it by protecting kernfs_node and kernfs_root with RCU and making kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() acquire rcu_read_lock() instead of kernfs_idr_lock. This adds an rcu_head to kernfs_node making it larger by 16 bytes on 64bit. Combined with the preceding rearrange patch, the net increase is 8 bytes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Cc: Andrea Righi <[email protected]> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When compiling with -Wformat it arises in drivers/hid/ipts/cmd.c and drivers/hid/ipts/mei.c some warning about wrong printf format, where a %ld is used for a size_t type, instead of a %zu. Here is a patch to fix those casting warnings.
0001-fix-size_t-printf-arguments.patch.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: