Bugfix: Exception from consumer.pause() in rebalance due to passing already revoked partition #88
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…th paused partitions
…lready revoked partition
kawamuray
changed the title
ocadaruma
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In current implementation the
consumer.pause()may throwIllegalStateException: No current assignment for partition ....When rebalance occurs, we save the list of partitions and restore the pause state later. However, since the rebalance might have taken over some partitions off from this instance, we have to filter these partitions from the argument of consumer.pause().
So this happens when all the following 3 conditions are met: