-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sweep: add docs and remove dead code #8674
sweep: add docs and remove dead code #8674
Conversation
Important Auto Review SkippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yayy, I love removing old code.
Also, great doc! Super awesome work on the sweeper all around 💯
55629ae
to
a82f657
Compare
Could we describe in the sample.conf that this setting: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Faster than expected so we already have a readme in 18.0 ❤️
a82f657
to
e855421
Compare
deadline together. Inputs with the same deadline express the same time | ||
sensitivity so it makes sense to sweep them in the same transaction. Once | ||
grouped, inputs in each batch are sorted based on their budgets. The only | ||
exception is inputs with `ExclusiveGroup` flag set, which will be swept alone. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
exception is inputs with `ExclusiveGroup` flag set, which will be swept alone. | |
exception is inputs with the `ExclusiveGroup` flag set, which will be swept alone. |
For instance, when anchor output is swept to perform a CPFP, one or more wallet | ||
UTXOs are likely to be used to meet the specified budget, which is also the | ||
case when sweeping second-level HTLC transactions. However, if the sweeping | ||
transaction also contains other to-be-swept inputs, a wallet UTXO is no longer | ||
needed if their values can cover the total budget. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For instance, when anchor output is swept to perform a CPFP, one or more wallet | |
UTXOs are likely to be used to meet the specified budget, which is also the | |
case when sweeping second-level HTLC transactions. However, if the sweeping | |
transaction also contains other to-be-swept inputs, a wallet UTXO is no longer | |
needed if their values can cover the total budget. | |
For instance, commitment and HTLC transactions usually have some proportion | |
of their outputs timelocked, preventing them from being used to pay fees immediately. | |
For these transactions, wallet UTXOs are often needed to get them confirmed in a timely | |
manner. |
Straightforward PR - removes the dead code, and adds a readme file.
Accidentally closed #8670, think what happened was the based branch was deleted, so the following PR is automatically closed?