Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vote button | updatedenommetadata placeholder/buttons #77

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

chalabi2
Copy link
Collaborator

@chalabi2 chalabi2 commented Nov 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced user interface for the Update Denom Metadata modal with improved input placeholders for better guidance.
    • Redesigned action button layout for improved usability in the Update Denom Metadata modal.
    • Updated button styling in the Vote Details modal for a more modern appearance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected spelling error in the function name from executeWithdrawl to executeWithdrawal for consistency.
  • Improvements

    • Refined button state handling logic in the Vote Details modal for clearer user interactions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the UpdateDenomMetadataModal and VoteDetailsModal components. Key updates include the addition of placeholder attributes for input fields in the metadata modal, restructuring of action buttons for improved layout, and a styling update for the vote details button. Additionally, a method name correction enhances code clarity. These changes aim to improve the user interface and maintain consistency across modal components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx - Added placeholder attributes to TextInput components.
- Restructured action buttons into a flex container.
- Removed unused form method for dialog closure.
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx - Updated button class for styling.
- Renamed executeWithdrawl to executeWithdrawal for consistency.
- Refined button state handling logic.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Uniformize modal look'n'feel (#30)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

render, bug

🐇 "In the meadow, where bunnies play,
New modals bloom, brightening the day.
With placeholders to guide, and buttons that gleam,
Our code is a canvas, a coder's sweet dream!
Let's hop to the rhythm, with style and grace,
Enhancing our app, in this joyful space!" 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@chalabi2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3904e3 and 1a489c4.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx (3)

Line range hint 129-157: Consider enhancing form field feedback.

While the placeholders effectively show current values, consider adding visual feedback for validation states:

 <TextInput
   label="NAME"
   name="name"
   value={values.name}
   placeholder={denom?.name}
+  className={`${errors.name && touched.name ? 'input-error' : ''}`}
+  helperText={touched.name && errors.name}
   onChange={handleChange}
 />

160-179: Consider UX improvements for action buttons.

The button layout looks good, but there are some UX considerations:

  1. Add confirmation dialog when canceling with unsaved changes:
 onClick={() => {
+  if (dirty) {
+    if (!confirm('You have unsaved changes. Are you sure you want to cancel?')) {
+      return;
+    }
+  }
   const modal = document.getElementById(modalId) as HTMLDialogElement;
   modal?.close();
 }}
  1. Consider swapping button order to follow platform conventions (primary action on the right):
-<button className="btn w-1/2 btn-neutral">Cancel</button>
-<button className="btn w-1/2 btn-gradient">Update</button>
+<button className="btn w-1/2 btn-gradient">Update</button>
+<button className="btn w-1/2 btn-neutral">Cancel</button>

164-167: Consider improving modal management architecture.

The current implementation uses direct DOM manipulation for modal control. Consider using React's controlled components pattern or a modal context:

  1. Create a modal context:
// modalContext.tsx
export const ModalContext = React.createContext({
  isOpen: false,
  openModal: () => {},
  closeModal: () => {},
});

export const ModalProvider: React.FC = ({ children }) => {
  const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false);
  return (
    <ModalContext.Provider 
      value={{
        isOpen,
        openModal: () => setIsOpen(true),
        closeModal: () => setIsOpen(false),
      }}
    >
      {children}
    </ModalContext.Provider>
  );
};
  1. Update modal implementation:
-<dialog id={modalId} className="modal">
+<Modal isOpen={isOpen} onClose={closeModal}>
   {/* modal content */}
-</dialog>
+</Modal>

This approach would:

  • Eliminate direct DOM manipulation
  • Provide better control over modal state
  • Make the component more testable

Also applies to: 184-186

components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (3)

Line range hint 574-591: Fix spelling: Rename 'executeWithdrawl' to 'executeWithdrawal'

The function name contains a spelling error. 'Withdrawl' should be 'Withdrawal'.

Apply this change throughout the file:

-                    case 'remove':
-                      executeWithdrawl();
+                    case 'remove':
+                      executeWithdrawal();

Line range hint 574-591: Enhance error handling in action handlers

The click handler contains multiple actions but lacks proper error boundaries. Consider wrapping the switch statement in a try-catch block for better error handling.

Consider this improvement:

                onClick={() => {
+                 try {
                    switch (getButtonState.action) {
                      case 'execute':
                        executeProposal();
                        break;
                      case 'vote':
                        handleVoteButtonClick();
                        break;
                      case 'remove':
                        executeWithdrawal();
                        break;
                    }
+                 } catch (error) {
+                   console.error('Action handler failed:', error);
+                   // Consider showing a user-friendly error message
+                 }
                }}

Line range hint 574-591: Enhance button accessibility

While the button includes an aria-label, it could benefit from more descriptive accessibility attributes.

Consider these accessibility improvements:

                <button
                  aria-label="action-btn"
+                 aria-busy={isSigning}
+                 aria-disabled={isSigning || (getButtonState.action === 'remove' && !proposal?.proposers?.includes(address ?? ''))}
                  disabled={
                    isSigning ||
                    (getButtonState.action === 'remove' &&
                      !proposal?.proposers?.includes(address ?? ''))
                  }
                  className="btn w-full btn-gradient text-white rounded-[12px]"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3904e3 and 1a489c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx (2 hunks)
  • components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (1)

574-574: LGTM: Button styling update aligns with modal design uniformity

The change from 'btn-primary' to 'btn-gradient' maintains consistency with the modal's updated design.

@fmorency fmorency merged commit 24c0121 into main Nov 26, 2024
6 checks passed
@fmorency fmorency deleted the chalabi/update_placeholder branch November 26, 2024 16:35
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.99%. Comparing base (8dc82b2) to head (1a489c4).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx 92.30% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #77      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.97%   58.99%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         145      145              
  Lines       14076    14085       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         8301     8310       +9     
  Misses       5775     5775              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uniformize modal look'n'feel
2 participants