fix: SQS partial batch responses error handling #70
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
swain
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 5.5.1 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivations
The logic for SQS partial batch responses had an error that caused it to log false negatives in terms of errors. It was caused by the
processWithOrderinglogic pre-filling the object that kept track of errors per group, which caused the subsequentObject.entriescall to always return something.Corrected and simplified logic inside
processWithOrdering+ fixed call site in the SQS module + added a unit test to catch the error. Without code changes, the unit test was failing.