Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: rewards history with address input back #438

Merged

Conversation

solidovic
Copy link
Contributor

@solidovic solidovic commented Aug 20, 2024

Description

Return the address input to the rewards history page

Demo

Loading
Снимок экрана 2024-08-20 в 14 24 26

Connected
Снимок экрана 2024-08-20 в 14 17 28

Error
Снимок экрана 2024-08-20 в 14 17 04

Not connected
Снимок экрана 2024-08-20 в 14 19 04

Empty
Снимок экрана 2024-08-20 в 14 18 46

Tooltip
Снимок экрана 2024-08-20 в 14 26 32

Checklist:

  • Checked the changes locally.
  • Created / updated analytics events.
  • Created / updated the technical documentation (README.md / docs / etc.).
  • Affects / requires changes in other services (Matomo / Sentry / CloudFlare / etc.).

@solidovic solidovic requested review from a team as code owners August 20, 2024 11:02
@preview-stands
Copy link

preview-stands bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Preview stand status

Stand was demolished

Jeday
Jeday previously approved these changes Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Jeday Jeday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Jeday
Jeday previously approved these changes Aug 20, 2024
@itaven itaven merged commit 84a98b2 into develop Aug 20, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@itaven itaven deleted the feature/si-1557-rewards-history-with-address-input-back branch August 20, 2024 14:45
@itaven itaven mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants