-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 282
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
better motivation for libp2p+HTTP #515
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -19,6 +19,16 @@ At the same time, nodes that are already connected via a libp2p connection, will | |||||
|
||||||
Any protocol that follows request-response semantics can easily be mapped onto HTTP (mapping protocols that don’t follow a request-response flow can be more challenging). Protocols are encouraged to follow best practices for building REST APIs. Once a mapping has been defined, a single implementation can be used to serve both traditional libp2p as well as libp2p-HTTP clients. | ||||||
|
||||||
Specifically, using libp2p+HTTP will allow: | ||||||
|
||||||
1. Defining services / protocols once, and run them both via HTTP and via libp2p | ||||||
1. Leverage libp2p's connectivity story (incl. hole punching) to run these services on both public nodes and on nodes behind NATs / firewall | ||||||
1. Use existing peer and content discovery mechanisms to advertise HTTP-enabled multiaddresses, which can then be accessed either via plain HTTP(S) or via HTTP on top of libp2p | ||||||
1. Support existing HTTP protocols like the S3 protocol. This would allow peers to fetch content seamlessly from an S3-compatible provider (S3, backblaze's B2, Cloudflare's R2) | ||||||
1. Support edge compute directly. Many edge compute environments build on top of HTTP since it’s a stateless request/response protocol. This includes services such as Cloudflare workers, AWS Lambda, Netflify Edge functions, and many more. | ||||||
1. Use peer authentication (both client and server auth) for a subset of HTTP endpoints | ||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
## Addressing | ||||||
|
||||||
Nodes may advertise HTTP multiaddresses to signal support for libp2p over HTTP. An address might look like this: `/ip4/1.2.3.4/tcp/443/tls/sni/example.com/http/p2p/<peer id>` (for HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2), or `/ip4/1.2.3.4/udp/443/quic/sni/example.com/http/p2p/<peer id>` (for HTTP/3). | ||||||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example, I imagine us shipping the S3 protocol support as part of go-libp2p. Then the provider records could include something like
/dns4/someS3Provider/https/s3/
. A client will see that provider when doing a content route lookup, and then be able to get the data directly. This could be piped to some other function that will verify the content hash.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This and the below point are the things I'm most excited about. Having edge DHT nodes would be really cool