Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

capi: Add test for blaze_inspect_syms_elf() with non-zero reserved bytes #962

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

danielocfb
Copy link
Collaborator

Add a test for the blaze_inspect_syms_elf() function with an input source that has reserved bytes that are non-zero.

Add a test for the blaze_inspect_syms_elf() function with an input
source that has reserved bytes that are non-zero.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.48%. Comparing base (f9c81b4) to head (8b74804).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
capi/src/inspect.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #962   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.47%   94.48%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines       10686    10687    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        10096    10098    +2     
+ Misses        590      589    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@danielocfb danielocfb merged commit 1c785a1 into libbpf:main Jan 14, 2025
41 checks passed
@danielocfb danielocfb deleted the topic/capi-test-non-reserved branch January 14, 2025 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants