-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: change Array.set to take a Nat and a tactic provided bound #5988
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kim-em
force-pushed
the
change_array_Set
branch
from
November 7, 2024 08:36
e0c8b2d
to
a1f5c3d
Compare
github-actions
bot
added
the
toolchain-available
A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
label
Nov 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2024
leanprover-community-bot
added
the
breaks-mathlib
This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan
label
Nov 7, 2024
kim-em
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
kim-em
added a commit
to leanprover-community/aesop
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
kim-em
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
leanprover-community-bot
added
builds-mathlib
CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR
and removed
breaks-mathlib
This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan
labels
Nov 11, 2024
kim-em
requested review from
hargoniX,
TwoFX,
digama0 and
tydeu
as code owners
November 11, 2024 02:33
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/batteries
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
added a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib4
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
Why? |
We decided that for most users it is more ergonomic to have the autoparam tactic provide the proof, rather than requiring the anonymous constructor notation to build a Certainly it is useful sometimes to have |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
builds-mathlib
CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR
changelog-library
Library
toolchain-available
A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR changes the signature of
Array.set
to take aNat
, and a tactic-provided bound, rather than aFin
.Corresponding changes (but without the auto-param) for
Array.get
will arrive shortly, after which I'll go more pervasively through the Array API.