-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build merging function #11
Comments
Hi, |
Hi Lars,
i often have the task to create a Z….-Variant by merging 2 or more other Variants, for example:
ZEUH_DB = FUNCTIONAL_DB + FUNCTIONAL_DB_ADDITION + PERFORMANCE_DB
I have tested this by merging the 3 xml’s inxml-level and it might be work.
So the only tasl is to merge XML-Content.
Tomorrow I test method/IWFND/CL_SUTIL_ODATA_MAPPER.GET_BUSINESS_DATA
Idea is to put in the xml’s to get structured data.
Best regards, Stefan
Best regards
Stefan Riedel-Seifert
…________________________________
Expert ABAP Development Technology | ATP Appl. Techn. Prod. and Logistics
Endress+Hauser InfoServe GmbH+Co. KG | Heinrich-von-Stephan-Str. 8 | 79100 Freiburg | Germany
Phone: +49 761 7059 115 | Mobile: +49 160 3637882 | Fax: +49 761 7059 5 115
[email protected] | www.infoserve.endress.com
________________________________
Endress+Hauser InfoServe GmbH+Co. KG
Location: Weil am Rhein
Registered: Amtsgericht Freiburg i. Br. HRA 411272
Individual liable partner: Endress+Hauser InfoServe Verwaltungs-GmbH, Weil am Rhein
Registered: Amtsgericht Freiburg i.Br. HRB 412621
Managing director: Pieter de Koning
________________________________
According to the General Data Protection Regulation,
we are obliged to inform you when collecting your personal data.
Wie comply with this information duty with the following Data Protection Statement<https://www.de.endress.com/de/cookies-endress+hauser-website>.
________________________________
Disclaimer:
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
This e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer unless explicitly and conspicuously designated or stated as such.
Von: Lars Hvam [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Sonntag,3.Juni2018 19:54
An: larshp/upDOWNci <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Riedel-Seifert <[email protected]>; Author <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [larshp/upDOWNci] Build merging function (#11)
Hi,
On which level? I guess first step is being able to compare 2 variants?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#11 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMbiuFGzu80vhr1rbr_lNqHb37Se7U_aks5t5CKqgaJpZM4UYK3p>.
|
For the above example I think the variants contains different checks, in this case it is quite easy. But if 2 checks to be combined contains different configurations for the same check, then the user has to decide which one to take, or to somehow merge it |
Yes, you’re right. As a mathematican i prefer the union set of all, as a first approach 😊
Best regards
Stefan Riedel-Seifert
…________________________________
Expert ABAP Development Technology | ATP Appl. Techn. Prod. and Logistics
Endress+Hauser InfoServe GmbH+Co. KG | Heinrich-von-Stephan-Str. 8 | 79100 Freiburg | Germany
Phone: +49 761 7059 115 | Mobile: +49 160 3637882 | Fax: +49 761 7059 5 115
[email protected] | www.infoserve.endress.com
________________________________
Endress+Hauser InfoServe GmbH+Co. KG
Location: Weil am Rhein
Registered: Amtsgericht Freiburg i. Br. HRA 411272
Individual liable partner: Endress+Hauser InfoServe Verwaltungs-GmbH, Weil am Rhein
Registered: Amtsgericht Freiburg i.Br. HRB 412621
Managing director: Pieter de Koning
________________________________
According to the General Data Protection Regulation,
we are obliged to inform you when collecting your personal data.
Wie comply with this information duty with the following Data Protection Statement<https://www.de.endress.com/de/cookies-endress+hauser-website>.
________________________________
Disclaimer:
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
This e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer unless explicitly and conspicuously designated or stated as such.
Von: Lars Hvam [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Juni 2018 21:03
An: larshp/upDOWNci <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Riedel-Seifert <[email protected]>; Author <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [larshp/upDOWNci] Build merging function (#11)
For the above example I think the variants contains different checks, in this case it is quite easy.
But if 2 checks to be combined contains different configurations for the same check, then the user has to decide which one to take, or to somehow merge it
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#11 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMbiuKdlAkdS9DPpRWJ3tJNRKDTXsHTsks5t5DLfgaJpZM4UYK3p>.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Maybe very useful to have the functionality to merge two variants.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: