LNK-3005: app-label-configuration #489
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to two configuration files: Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Application
participant Loki
Application->>Loki: Send logs with app identifier
Loki-->>Application: Acknowledge receipt of logs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Java/measureeval/src/main/resources/logback-spring.xml (1)
22-22: Approved with suggestion: Consider adding a default valueThe modification to use
${loki_app}instead of the hardcoded "MeasureEval" is a good improvement. It allows for dynamic setting of the application name in the log labels, which is consistent with the newly added spring property.However, to safeguard against potential issues where
loki.appmight not be set, consider adding a default value. This can be done either in the spring property declaration or in the usage:
- In the spring property declaration:
<springProperty scope="context" name="loki_app" source="loki.app" defaultValue="MeasureEval"/>
- Or in the usage:
<pattern>app=${loki_app:-MeasureEval},component=MeasureEval,TraceId="%X{traceId}",SpanId="%X{spanId}"</pattern>This ensures that even if
loki.appis not set, a meaningful value will still be used.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- Java/measureeval/src/main/resources/application.yml (1 hunks)
- Java/measureeval/src/main/resources/logback-spring.xml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Java/measureeval/src/main/resources/logback-spring.xml (2)
6-6: LGTM: Enhances logging configurabilityThe addition of the
loki_appspring property is a good improvement. It allows for dynamic configuration of the application name in the logging setup, which enhances the flexibility of the logging system. This change is consistent with the existing pattern of using spring properties for Loki configuration.
Line range hint
1-58: Overall assessment: Good improvements, testing details neededThe changes made to this file align well with the PR objectives of addressing app label configuration. They enhance the flexibility and configurability of the logging system without introducing significant risks. The use of spring properties for dynamic configuration is a good practice.
However, as mentioned in the PR description, there's a lack of information about the testing performed on these changes. Given that logging configuration can have system-wide impacts, it's crucial to ensure thorough testing.
Could you please provide details on the testing performed, particularly:
- Verification that the
loki.appproperty is correctly read and applied.- Confirmation that logs are correctly labeled when the property is set.
- Behavior when the
loki.appproperty is not set.This information will help ensure the reliability of these changes in various scenarios.
🛠 Description of Changes
Please provide a high-level overview of the changes included in this PR.
🧪 Testing Performed
Please describe the testing that was performed on the changes included in this PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes