Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Initial Quality Assurance guidelines/flow #94
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Added Initial Quality Assurance guidelines/flow #94
Changes from 7 commits
77f3097
cb1628b
2592b3f
9eee1ef
1b26f26
785a84e
7556697
055cd24
cf43017
ee86165
3072e8e
1de8120
8830ee9
c59d910
c826658
214d47c
cf5355d
a562f75
437da6c
7969224
f6f8cf3
ef37320
2b6e138
ae57017
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we enforce usage of https://github.com/langleyfoxall/laravel-nist-password-rules?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I never wrote this for explicitly Laravel - it's just a general web assurance guide to ensure that the projects we write for Web, irregardless of technology, all follow the same basic principles, the steps outlined can be applied to any web stack.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could do something similar to the following.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm against blanket enforcing the NIST rules due to their complexities and it would cause a significant barrier to entry for social apps (registration processes) and uptake to those platforms.
For that reason I think a lower level as a minimum (8 Chars) is enough, but its preferable in our enterprise software to opt for NIST specification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wheatleyjj New suggestion based on your feedback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be worth mentioning ensuring the HTML and CSS in the email works on the popular clients if custom HTML and CSS is being written. There are good resources such as this guide which lets you search by email clients.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A possible problem count occur here if QA is testing on the
master
branch, and development continues on with development of the next sprint in the mean time.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we should mark a version/end of sprint branch that the QA team uses?
Thoughts? @dextermb @AlexCatch @NilesB @DivineOmega @robmilward
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wheatleyjj What about testing on staging? We should be aiming to push a version to staging at the end of any sprint so it makes sense to do QA on that branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @AlexCatch about testing on staging since that is essentially a development environment anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've worked on projects previously with this kind of QA process in place.
At the start of a sprint, a
sprint-1
branch would be created. After the sprint is over, QA would begin testing onsprint-1
. At the same time asprint-2
branch would be created (fromsprint-1
) to allow developers to continue development immediately.Once QA was happy with
sprint-1
it would be merged intomater
, and the process would repeat.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ash123456789 @AlexCatch I think that testing on the customers environment would cause annoyances to the client if they're using it regularly.
Ways around this are sprint branches as I and @DivineOmega suggested or having a development environment - but that comes with another layer of grief. I'm also thinking experienced QA testers will have good knowledge of automation tests so would be able to look into both the Blackbox/Whitebox sections of this document more easily if they have it running locally.
Thumbs up if you agree?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wheatleyjj Agree with the sprint branches and/or development server idea. 👍